Immigrants from Lithuania vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,712,569 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.454% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 454.4 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $35,688, a difference of 43.9%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $85,647, a difference of 37.8%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $46,419, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $50,279, a difference of 9.4%), wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $52,832, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 73.3%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 71.3%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.2%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.6%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.41, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.6%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 75.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and female disability (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.2%).