Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,223,837 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.173% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 172.9 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.0%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $56,243, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $96,824, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $43,243, a difference of 0.17%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $64,989, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $53,818, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.76%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.73%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), disability (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.7%).