Houma vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,781,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.113% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 113.3 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $122,343, a difference of 69.7%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $105,262, a difference of 68.2%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $125,312, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $66,078, a difference of 30.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $58,239, a difference of 31.3%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $56,253, a difference of 44.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 108.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 103.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 97.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 77.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 61.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 84.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.90%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 203.7%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 194.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 158.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.27%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 98.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 86.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.6%).