Immigrants from Liberia vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,213,035 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 98.0 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $119,496, a difference of 47.8%), per capita income ($38,165 compared to $53,874, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $105,262, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $58,239, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $46,481, a difference of 22.4%), and wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 56.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.60%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 30.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 70.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.87%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.1%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 95.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.6%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.7%).