Norwegian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,657,473 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.659. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 30.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $119,496, a difference of 23.4%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $105,262, a difference of 22.3%), and per capita income ($44,480 compared to $53,874, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $58,239, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $70,238, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 44.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.85%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 118.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 83.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.3%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 67.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%).