Immigrants from Fiji vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,392,625 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 273.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,694 compared to $53,874, a difference of 26.2%), median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $66,078, a difference of 20.2%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $58,239, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $70,238, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $46,481, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.73%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.97%), currently married (46.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (68.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 79.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 49.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 74.4%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2nd grade (96.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.8%).