Immigrants from Eritrea vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,814,831 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 115.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,466 compared to $119,496, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $122,343, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($85,025 compared to $105,262, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $46,481, a difference of 12.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $58,239, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $70,238, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and family households (60.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.88%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.31%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.26%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.5%).