Immigrants from Belize vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,211,273 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.814% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to a decrease of 813.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,141 compared to $119,496, a difference of 43.7%), median family income ($89,197 compared to $125,312, a difference of 40.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,229 compared to $122,343, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $58,239, a difference of 13.7%), wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and median female earnings ($37,056 compared to $46,481, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 58.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 54.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.0%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 47.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 119.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 88.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.7%).