Immigrants from Netherlands vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,034,463 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Netherlands communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Netherlands within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.623% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Netherlands corresponds to an increase of 622.9 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,082 compared to $119,496, a difference of 13.7%), median household income ($94,411 compared to $105,262, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($41,870 compared to $46,481, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,463 compared to $70,238, a difference of 5.7%), per capita income ($50,458 compared to $53,874, a difference of 6.8%), and wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 18.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 44.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 41.4%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.4%).