Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,650,608 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 15.7 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $119,496, a difference of 28.7%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $66,078, a difference of 24.1%), and per capita income ($43,464 compared to $53,874, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $58,239, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $70,238, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 32.0%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.57%), family households (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.97%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 63.3%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 48.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.1%).