Immigrants from Austria vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,180,071 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.716% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to a decrease of 716.2 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,103 compared to $119,496, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $58,239, a difference of 11.1%), and median household income ($95,277 compared to $105,262, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,503 compared to $53,874, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($68,208 compared to $70,238, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($62,164 compared to $66,078, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.3%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.54%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and female poverty (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.2%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and family households with children (25.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 34.3%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.5%).