Uruguayan vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,233,866 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 165.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $119,496, a difference of 27.6%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $125,312, a difference of 24.5%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $105,262, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $58,239, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $46,481, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.3%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.84%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 64.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.9%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).