Fijian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,034,056 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 79.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $119,496, a difference of 49.4%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $53,874, a difference of 46.8%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $66,078, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $58,239, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $70,238, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 47.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 157.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 122.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.3%).