Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,190,779 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from North Macedonia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North Macedonia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.495% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North Macedonia corresponds to a decrease of 495.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,101 compared to $119,496, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($45,622 compared to $53,874, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($89,741 compared to $105,262, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,503 compared to $58,239, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and median male earnings ($59,189 compared to $66,078, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (17.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.31%), single female poverty (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.71%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 79.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.8%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.2%).