Costa Rican vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,798,324 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 10.7 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $119,496, a difference of 25.0%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $53,874, a difference of 22.2%), and median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $66,078, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $58,239, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $70,238, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.39%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.81%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).