Native Hawaiian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,532,575 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.135% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 134.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $53,874, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $66,078, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $119,496, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $70,238, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $58,239, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 35.8%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 82.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 84.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 71.4%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.1%).