Immigrants from Mexico vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,205,973 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 50.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $53,874, a difference of 58.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $119,496, a difference of 51.6%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $125,312, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $58,239, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $70,238, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 65.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 63.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.1%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.9%), family households (69.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 72.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 163.3%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 146.6%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 119.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.3%).