Immigrants from Latin America vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,473,159 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.725. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 29.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $53,874, a difference of 46.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $119,496, a difference of 45.4%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $125,312, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $58,239, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $46,481, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 57.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.69%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 54.9%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.42 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 123.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 97.7%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.5%).