Immigrants from Guatemala vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,732,150 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.638. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.088% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 88.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $119,496, a difference of 46.9%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $125,312, a difference of 43.7%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $53,874, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $58,239, a difference of 13.2%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $70,238, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 64.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 6.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.0%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.71%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 109.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 89.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.6%).