Immigrants from Uruguay vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,896,366 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.686% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 685.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $119,496, a difference of 31.1%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $125,312, a difference of 27.6%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $105,262, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $58,239, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $46,481, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.3%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 72.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%).