Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yakama
Indian (Asian)
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yakama
Indians (Asian)
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Indian (Asian) Integration in Yakama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,521,897 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 69.0 Indians (Asian).
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $53,874, a difference of 63.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $119,496, a difference of 56.8%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $125,312, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $58,239, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $70,238, a difference of 24.9%).
Income Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,009 | Exceptional $53,874 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,932 | Exceptional $125,312 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,225 | Exceptional $105,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,107 | Exceptional $56,253 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,002 | Exceptional $66,078 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,354 | Exceptional $46,481 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,321 | Exceptional $58,239 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,226 | Exceptional $119,496 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,992 | Exceptional $122,343 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,234 | Exceptional $70,238 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 122.4%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 85.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 29.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.4%).
Poverty Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.3% | Excellent 19.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 25.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 131.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Average 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.8% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Tragic 31.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Tragic 71.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.6% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 119.6%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.7%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.24, a difference of 6.2%), family households (69.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.8% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 112.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 101.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 62.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 31.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 12.9% | Good 6.4% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 126.8%), master's degree (9.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 116.1%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 111.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.0% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.0% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 74.5% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 70.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 46.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 54.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 47.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.9% |
Yakama vs Indian (Asian) Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 53.1%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 0.28%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Disability Metric | Yakama | Indian (Asian) |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.00% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.3% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |