Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Immigrants from Ecuador

Good
Poor
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,868,165 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 147.4 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Brazilian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 18.9%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $92,837, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $91,462, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $38,644, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $44,462, a difference of 8.8%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
22.5%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
15.0%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.3%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
82.2%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.5%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
33.7%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 129.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.0%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
4.2%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.5%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.52%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%