Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Immigrants from Ecuador

Good
Poor
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,303,280 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.309% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 309.4 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Slavic Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 22.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $54,030, a difference of 14.2%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $92,837, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $38,644, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $53,722, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $44,462, a difference of 6.8%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.5%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 51.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 47.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.7%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.0%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.9%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 30.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
82.2%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (48.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Tragic
33.7%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 166.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.3%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.2%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricSlavicImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%