Slovak vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,298,136 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 28.4%), median family income ($103,729 compared to $92,837, a difference of 11.7%), and median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $50,474, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,029 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.99%), median household income ($83,798 compared to $80,341, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($47,095 compared to $44,462, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 37.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.0%), currently married (48.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 188.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 49.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 43.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 129.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.8%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.7%).