Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,767,486 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $54,030, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $91,462, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,495 compared to $41,195, a difference of 0.73%), median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $38,644, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $53,722, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 42.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 36.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.4%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 150.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 121.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 96.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 53.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 96.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.1%), and male disability (13.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.9%).