Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hungarians

Immigrants from Ecuador

Good
Poor
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Hungarian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,746,329 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Hungarian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $54,030, a difference of 14.1%), and median family income ($105,609 compared to $92,837, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $38,644, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $53,722, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($47,795 compared to $44,462, a difference of 7.5%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,426
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,609
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Good
$86,920
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,795
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,309
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,510
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,247
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,544
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,913
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,673
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
22.5%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Good
13.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.0%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Tragic
82.2%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.4%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
33.7%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 140.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 39.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.9%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.2%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 93.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.3%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.2%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricHungarianImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%