Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,057,190 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,312 compared to $92,837, a difference of 35.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $91,462, a difference of 33.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $89,673, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,722, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $38,644, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 43.7%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 69.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 12.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 106.6%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 71.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.5%).