Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Ecuador
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,711,579 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.608% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 608.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $41,195, a difference of 25.7%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $92,837, a difference of 25.1%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $50,474, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,644, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $44,462, a difference of 17.8%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Tragic $41,195 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Tragic $92,837 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Tragic $80,341 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Tragic $44,462 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Tragic $50,474 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Poor $38,644 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $53,722 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Tragic $89,673 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Tragic $91,462 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Tragic $54,030 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Excellent 12.5% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Average 16.3% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 31.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Tragic 20.9% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Poor 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 10.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Tragic 31.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 72.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Poor 84.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 82.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.9%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Excellent 27.7% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 42.9% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Excellent 11.8% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 33.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 102.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 37.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 15.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 33.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 23.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 40.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.8%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 95.8% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 93.7% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 91.8% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.4% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 89.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 87.5% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 84.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Tragic 58.7% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 53.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 34.7% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Fair 23.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Average 47.4% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 17.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Average 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |