Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Ecuador

Fair
Poor
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,252,271 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 17.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,722, a difference of 18.2%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $80,341, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $54,030, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $50,474, a difference of 5.8%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $92,837, a difference of 9.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
82.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
33.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 202.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 84.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 71.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
4.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 83.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%