Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sioux
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sioux
Immigrants from Ecuador
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Sioux Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,454,883 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 97.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $41,195, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $80,341, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,089 compared to $89,673, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $54,030, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $38,644, a difference of 10.2%).
Income Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,921 | Tragic $41,195 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,386 | Tragic $92,837 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,792 | Tragic $80,341 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,448 | Tragic $44,462 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,566 | Tragic $50,474 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,063 | Poor $38,644 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,417 | Exceptional $53,722 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,089 | Tragic $89,673 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,750 | Tragic $91,462 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,509 | Tragic $54,030 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.3% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 77.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 56.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.8%).
Poverty Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Poverty | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.6% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 22.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 23.9% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.8% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.5% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 34.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.7% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.2% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.9%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 42.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.52 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.0% | Tragic 33.7% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 136.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 68.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 23.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.8% | Tragic 40.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.3%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.78%), college, under 1 year (59.4% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 93.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 91.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 84.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.4% | Tragic 58.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.0% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.1% | Tragic 34.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Sioux vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Sioux | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.3% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |