Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Armenian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Armenians

Immigrants from Ecuador

Average
Poor
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Armenian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,608,251 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Armenian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($109,692 compared to $92,837, a difference of 18.2%), per capita income ($48,287 compared to $41,195, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,002 compared to $91,462, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $38,644, a difference of 9.2%), and wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,287
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,692
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,807
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,804
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,134
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,212
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,179
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$103,248
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,002
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,656
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.8%
Exceptional
22.5%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.2%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Good
13.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
15.0%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
64.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.5%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Tragic
82.2%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 40.3%), births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.71%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Good
3.25
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
33.7%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 154.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.7%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.3%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.2%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.3%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.0%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricArmenianImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.7%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.0%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.6%