Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,718,131 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.489% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 488.7 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,848 compared to $92,837, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,434 compared to $91,462, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $54,030, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,644, a difference of 9.8%), and median earnings ($50,581 compared to $44,462, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 46.7%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 44.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.63%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.2%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 116.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 16.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.89%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%).