Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,290,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,529 compared to $53,722, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,045 compared to $89,673, a difference of 14.9%), and median household income ($71,801 compared to $80,341, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.80%), householder income over 65 years ($54,512 compared to $54,030, a difference of 0.89%), and median family income ($89,285 compared to $92,837, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (32.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 31.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in family households (59.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 9.6%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (40.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.85%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 112.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.7%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%).