Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,100,119 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 6.8 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $53,722, a difference of 12.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $89,673, a difference of 10.9%), and wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $54,030, a difference of 0.12%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $38,644, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($90,450 compared to $92,837, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (41.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 95.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.3%).