South American Indian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,423,717 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 69.3 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $54,030, a difference of 15.1%), median family income ($103,624 compared to $92,837, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $91,462, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $38,644, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($46,952 compared to $44,462, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.1%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.28%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 97.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.2%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.62%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%).