Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,452,550 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to an increase of 6.4 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($130,894 compared to $92,837, a difference of 41.0%), per capita income ($57,759 compared to $41,195, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($75,081 compared to $54,030, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($47,154 compared to $38,644, a difference of 22.0%), and wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 80.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.89%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 52.7%), births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 184.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 43.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 49.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 114.9%), professional degree (7.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 92.5%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.80%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.6%).