British vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,038,597 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.776. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.504% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 503.8 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 28.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $54,030, a difference of 18.3%), and median family income ($108,705 compared to $92,837, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $38,644, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($48,189 compared to $44,462, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 56.8%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.1%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.9%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 213.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 48.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.9%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%).