Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cheyenne

Immigrants from Ecuador

Poor
Poor
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Cheyenne Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,088,588 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to a decrease of 25.6 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Cheyenne Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($66,974 compared to $80,341, a difference of 20.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $91,462, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $53,722, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $54,030, a difference of 0.12%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $38,644, a difference of 8.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,276
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$81,385
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,974
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,062
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,673
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,275
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,152
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,362
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,096
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Exceptional
22.5%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 46.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 44.7%), and married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
28.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.0%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 97.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and female unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.6%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.3%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.6%
Tragic
82.2%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (42.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (42.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.47
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Tragic
33.7%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 103.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 95.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 16.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 34.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 69.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
4.2%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.3%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.7%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
31.1%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%