Immigrants from Russia vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,711,376 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.232% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 231.6 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $53,739, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $66,891, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,044 compared to $52,074, a difference of 0.060%), median household income ($96,378 compared to $96,490, a difference of 0.12%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $113,533, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (63.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.1%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%).