Immigrants from Central America vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,137,754 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $52,074, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $118,440, a difference of 39.3%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $62,857, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $53,739, a difference of 5.3%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $66,891, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 72.4%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 55.9%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 44.6%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 123.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 105.1%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 102.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.55%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%).