Belgian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,922,152 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Australians within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,951 compared to $52,074, a difference of 18.5%), median family income ($102,788 compared to $118,440, a difference of 15.2%), and median household income ($84,008 compared to $96,490, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $53,739, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $66,891, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.7%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.35%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.3%).