Crow vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,519,054 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.847. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.438% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 438.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $52,074, a difference of 64.1%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $118,440, a difference of 54.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $113,533, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,739, a difference of 14.3%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,308, a difference of 22.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $52,294, a difference of 35.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 121.7%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 106.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 252.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 232.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 230.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.5%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 86.4%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 73.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.0%).