Houma vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,930,492 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,996 compared to $52,074, a difference of 57.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $113,533, a difference of 57.5%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $118,440, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $53,739, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $62,857, a difference of 24.3%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $52,294, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 86.9%), single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 85.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 76.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (45.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (65.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 165.6%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 150.2%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 132.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 73.8%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.7%).