Cuban vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,200 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $118,440, a difference of 39.4%), per capita income ($37,383 compared to $52,074, a difference of 39.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $66,891, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $53,739, a difference of 6.1%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $43,308, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 89.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 62.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.63%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 33.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.3%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.89%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.1%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Australian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).