Immigrants from Uruguay vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,459,110 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($98,205 compared to $118,440, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $62,857, a difference of 18.9%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $52,074, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,308, a difference of 11.2%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.5%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.94%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.9%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.2%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%).