Immigrants from Guyana vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,920,910 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 53.5%), median family income ($92,513 compared to $118,440, a difference of 28.0%), and per capita income ($40,742 compared to $52,074, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $53,739, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $43,308, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($45,204 compared to $52,294, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 75.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.65%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 38.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.7%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 192.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 92.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 78.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 27.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 61.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 78.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 79.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%).