Uruguayan vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,737,033 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 100.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,656 compared to $118,440, a difference of 17.7%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $52,074, a difference of 17.5%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $62,857, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $43,308, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.9%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.14%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.0%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).