Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,927,728 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $96,490, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $62,857, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $113,533, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,660 compared to $52,074, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $66,891, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.7%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.1%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.3%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.69%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%).