Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,035,093 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 35.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $52,074, a difference of 31.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $107,912, a difference of 31.2%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $62,857, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $53,739, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $43,308, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $66,891, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.40%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.6%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.82%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%).