Filipino vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,734,973 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $96,490, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $107,912, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $113,533, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $53,739, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $52,074, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 28.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (49.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%).